tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-243281239817795464.post1289289480029476301..comments2023-11-03T06:21:19.581-04:00Comments on CleanEnergySC.com: Public (Self-)Service AuthorityCoastal Conservation Leaguehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05349456658389361136noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-243281239817795464.post-46099087119661356642008-02-29T06:40:00.000-05:002008-02-29T06:40:00.000-05:00By the way, I don't really think y'all are dumb or...By the way, I don't really think y'all are dumb or wanting for intellect. But they were good lines and I wanted to use them. My apologies if I've offended anyone.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-243281239817795464.post-75870180195444848112008-02-28T19:42:00.000-05:002008-02-28T19:42:00.000-05:00Rusty, you're just dumber than a bag of hammers! ...Rusty, you're just dumber than a bag of hammers! <BR/><BR/>You said "Instead of spending money on creating the best energy efficiency program money can buy, or on renewable energy technologies..." (paraphrasing) apparently Santee Cooper spent that money hatching a sinister communist plot. I will ignore that poor logic for now. <BR/><BR/>Now you may call it an unreasoning optimism. You may call it obtuse. But the plain fact is that Strom Thurmond, long known for his strong opposition to communism, was one of Santee Cooper's earliest and biggest supporters. Heck boys, just google "Strom Thurmond" and "Santee Cooper!" I like to think that I'm a pretty astute observer of the human scene. Strom, rest his soul, seemed at times a sour-assed sonofabitch and not given to acts of pointless sentimentality. If he didn't see anything wrong with Santee Cooper, I don't see why any other conservative would, and I don't see why we should waste time with your foolish innuendo on the subject. <BR/><BR/>But that was only one small part of your illogical sentence. Now, I know it's a fool looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart, but hear me out: the very article you posted indicates that of the $650,000 Santee Cooper spent, less than one part in ten was spent on that poll. One part in ten! The article goes on to say that "the expenses also went toward the [c]reation [sic] of Santee Cooper Green, an initiative the utility rolled out in December to brand the 21 existing conservation and renewable-energy programs offered by the utility, as well as any future initiatives." Isn't this the very thing you claim to WANT Santee Cooper to spend money on? Do you read the material you post, or just foam at the mouth and slap it up here? It just never fails; once again you knuckleheads prove Hanlon's Razor by showing how much you want for intellect.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com